Monthly Archives: April 2012

Making Culture Through Experiments – Notes on Culturematic

I just read Grant McCracken’s new book Culturematic. (Finally, an anthropologist who writes like a human!) Here are some notes, not a review, just notes to help me keep track of ideas.

- A culturematic is a little machine for making culture. It is designed to test the world, discover meaning, and unleash value (p.3)

- Objectives of the book: 1. To catch up the cultural side of innovation to technology 2. To take innovation from trendy to practical 3. To save innovation from bureaucratic bludgeoning 4. To describe what’s happening “out there” 5. To create a new model of business creativity 6. To keep branding/marketing experimental 7. “Fix” startups so that they experiment more 8. Help individuals put things out in the world that will reward them (both monetarily and emotionally)  (p.5-8)

- Culture is changing faster than ever and the future is inscrutable. Old models and frameworks can’t help us predict what is to come. Corporations are in trouble if they don’t break old patterns/find new patterns. “An inscrutable future is antithetical to the corporation.” Only when problems are clear, are the systems within a corporation setup to efficiently manage and resolve them. (p.31)

- EXPERIMENT, EXPERIMENT, EXPERIMENT. Create a “photo pour, a stream of possibilities neither too formed by our expectations nor completely random.” “A series of experiments.” (p.42)

- Labs within larger institutions should not hold their ideas prisoner, but let their ideas go into the world. The more tests you throw out there, the more information you get back.

- Super interesting because I know a bunch of people living in France: “The French…have lost some of their feeling for cultural invention…Paris, with its centrist tendency, state sponsorship, and patrician intellectuals, is a dangerous place for ideas.” (Boom!)

- Culturematics do not have a clear objective, they capture our attention, are focused (limited scope – often bounded by time or place), they are doable by others, are exploratory but clever enough not to be 1000 random ideas hoping that something sticks. They are playful, yet serious, and aim to change the way we think about something, often by splicing together unexpected things/people/ideas.

- My new fave word: jejune.

- Examples of culturematics: James Franco, Dan Harmon’s Channel 101, SNL Digital Shorts, whysoserious.com…many, many more. So many great examples in this book.

Anthropology love

I love how McCracken puts culturematic successes into (mainly US) context, bringing in examples from post-WWII  food consumption (p. 82) to the rise of “low brow” taste in middle class suburbs (p. 127).

I also love how he makes anthropology accessible to the masses by explaining what it can do in plain language, sometimes explicitly citing anthropology/-ists and sometimes injecting it directly into the culturematic concept.

- Challenging assumptions. “Designed to dig down into the cultural assumptions that organize our world, and then rework these assumptions to create new value.” (p.88) AND “for the CEO…find the assumptions inside” (p.225)

- “Bad is often better than bland.” (p. 124) Working with designers, I noticed that they are much more concerned with “good” and “bad” behavior and “good” and “bad” design, outcomes, etc. than any anthropologist I know.

- Breaking down categories, splicing them, mixing and matching (p. 136), blurring boundaries (p. 159)

- “Be an anthropologist” and write your own local ethnographies (p. 191)

- Discussion of “third places” (p. 214)

Questions:

“Culturematics…should aid the corporation, encouraging it to play, embracing even projects that are quirky and inconsiderable.” I’ve worked in corporations where play was limited to keep up appearances. Especially during a recession, it was not appropriate to even seem like we were having too much fun while working because it could be misconstrued as wasting time. How do you build play into corporate culture if it’s not there from the beginning?

Does a culturematic have to be successful to exist? How is success or value defined? What is a failed culturematic?

——

Now time to make my own…

Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Over-personalized. Google, I need some space.

Google’s constantly being praised and criticized for its products and policies. This means it’s right where it should be, on the edge, always pushing the boundaries of technology and users’ comfort levels.  In general, I love Google products. “Googling” is probably my main go-to internet activity. What’s the population of Argentina? Google it. How many ounces in a pound? Google it. I’ve been using gmail for years. Picasa, YouTube, Google docs, even google+ a little bit.

However, this recent bleeding of services so that all Google products are connected and they are all personalized to me is too much, too fast. This goes much further than feeling as if my privacy is being invaded, because I actually don’t mind most of their privacy policy. What they’ve done by making everything hyper-personalized, is that I no longer know what data is private, shared, or completely public. This is highly anxiety-producing.

When I search [embarrassing key words here] and two pictures I took and three of my contacts’ profile thumbnails show up in the search it freaks me out!! I know that Google’s been personalizing and filtering searches for a long time, but I at least had the impression that my searches were private. And I especially had the impression that my photos and my contact lists were private. I even had a false comfort that my Google search results were more or less similar to others’ searches, and by googling my name I might get a sense of what others might see. Yes, Eli Pariser, I know that it was a false comfort, but it felt comfortable, nonetheless. Now, My google+ images that I have not shared with anyone come up in my Google searches and it feels as if they’ve been leaked, made public somehow. Just last night I tried to privately share photos from my friend’s bachelorette party on Picasa, and they automatically uploaded to google+, not Picasa. Maybe they weren’t shared with anyone, but it felt like they were. And I definitely don’t want them coming up in my searches without my control. It made me so uneasy that I deleted the album.

I need more control over what is shared or not, public or not. And I need visual cues that assure me that my stuff is either public or not. Let’s make some walls around what is mine, what is yours, and what is for the world. OK? Physical stuff, a house for example, is divided into public and private spaces. Guests know to stay in the public spaces (which may differ from one culture to the next). They don’t usually go digging through your underwear drawer the first time they come over, but they probably stay in the foyer and living room, for example.

My Google house needs major renovations. The load-bearing wall is crumbling, my bathroom is in the backyard, my closets are open for all to see. I don’t trust Google to keep different types of data separate.

Good news, this can be fixed! Let’s do some user research, some participatory design so that users help create the blueprints for their Google data houses, and let’s put the walls back up where they belong.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Hairiest Ballerina (A Fictional Tale)

There once was a hairy little girl, named Harriet, who wanted more than anything to be a ballerina. She pranced and twirled all day long, swan-diving off furniture pretending to be in a professional production. Her parents could see her enthusiasm and agreed to buy her pink ballet slippers, a little tutu, and lessons.  Hairy little Harriet practically flew into her first lesson but stopped abruptly in the entrance. She found before her a sea of alabaster-skinned, blond 8-year-olds, their translucent peau practically aglow beneath their baby pink tutus and tights. Hairy little Harriet looked down at her hairy little legs and hairy little arms and turned beet red with embarrassment. Because you see, she was half Assyrian and half Anglo-mutt, which in her case created a combination of cream colored skin and dark, thick black hair – all over. Assyrians say that hairy people are nice people, but Harriet was pretty sure that a hairy Assyrian made that up to feel better. The poster children of the Aryan nation turned and glared at her. They pointed at Harriet and gasped, “Why are you so hairy?!”

Harriet looked down and thought, “I don’t fit in here.” But before she could turn around and leave, the ballet instructor started to play music and led the children in leaps around the dance floor. Harriet felt herself emboldened by the music. Before she knew it, she too, was leaping across the floor. She leaped higher and higher. Then all of a sudden a breeze caught her hair and she glided higher and higher with every leap. She could leap so high she even leaped over some of the other girls’ heads.

When the music stopped, all the other little girls turned and glared at hairy little Harriet. They gasped, “How did you learn to dance so well? How do you leap so high? Can you show us?” From that day on, the other little girls never made fun of Harriet again for they could see that the hair was in fact a magical power, making her the hairiest and the prettiest little ballerina around.

Tagged , , , , , , ,
%d bloggers like this: